gathering: has quality worth

Related concepts

Parents	meeting Weight: 0.67 , event Weight: 0.65 , function Weight: 0.57 , day Weight: 0.54
Siblings	birthday party Weight: 0.71 , picnic Weight: 0.66 , retreat Weight: 0.63 , convention Weight: 0.61 , conference Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality worth	1.00
has quality bad	0.82
has quality wrong	0.78
affect value	0.77
has quality difference	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(conference, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(gathering, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(gathering, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)