gathering: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, event
Weight: 0.65
, function
Weight: 0.57
, day
Weight: 0.54
Siblings birthday party
Weight: 0.71
, picnic
Weight: 0.66
, retreat
Weight: 0.63
, convention
Weight: 0.61
, conference
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality worth 0.78
has quality difference 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(gathering, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(gathering, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gathering, has quality worth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)