lecture: has quality definition

Related concepts

Parents	presentation Weight: 0.69 , topic Weight: 0.60 , discussion Weight: 0.59 , event Weight: 0.59 , subject Weight: 0.58
Siblings	seminar Weight: 0.35 , recital Weight: 0.34 , speaker Weight: 0.34 , concert Weight: 0.34 , forum Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality definition	1.00
has quality right	0.77
has quality good	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(presentation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(presentation, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(presentation, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(speaker, has quality right)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality definition)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(presentation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(seminar, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality definition)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(speaker, has quality right) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(speaker, has quality right)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(lecture, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(lecture, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(lecture, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(presentation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(seminar, has quality definition)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(speaker, has quality right)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(presentation, has quality good)