hearing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.60
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.34
, memorial day
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32
, gathering
Weight: 0.32
, discussion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
CAN good 0.81
be good sense have 0.77
has quality loss 0.77
have bad reputation 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hearing, be good sense have)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hearing, be good sense have)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hearing, be good sense have)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality loss)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality loss)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be good sense have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)