hearing: has quality loss

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.60
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.34
, memorial day
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32
, gathering
Weight: 0.32
, discussion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality loss 1.00
be impacted by weight loss 0.83
has quality bad 0.79
has quality good 0.77
has quality better 0.77
has quality worth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality loss)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality loss)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality loss)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hearing, be impacted by weight loss)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hearing, be impacted by weight loss)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hearing, be impacted by weight loss)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be impacted by weight loss)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)