hearing: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.60
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.34
, memorial day
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32
, gathering
Weight: 0.32
, discussion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better than yugioh 0.86
has quality wrong 0.83
has quality worth 0.83
be made better 0.83
has quality loss 0.77
CAN good 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meeting, be made better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(meeting, be made better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(meeting, be made better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meeting, be made better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gathering, be better than yugioh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hearing, has quality loss)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality loss)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meeting, be made better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meeting, be made better)