discussion: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
is response questions 0.85
is free response questions 0.84
is answers 0.78
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agenda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(plan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(agenda, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(agenda, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(plan, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(agenda, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plan, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seminar, is free response questions)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality questions)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(seminar, is response questions)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(seminar, is answers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(agenda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(plan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(agenda, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(seminar, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(seminar, is response questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(seminar, is response questions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(seminar, is answers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(seminar, is answers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(seminar, is free response questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(seminar, is free response questions)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lecture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(discussion, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(discussion, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(plan, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(seminar, is answers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(seminar, is response questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seminar, is free response questions)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(plan, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)