tundra: have low biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low biodiversity 1.00
have biodiversity 0.96
have least biodiversity 0.92
is habitat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tundra, is habitat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, is habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity)