tundra: is habitat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is habitat 1.00
have biodiversity 0.81
have low biodiversity 0.79
have least biodiversity 0.78
is ecosystem 0.78
is endangered 0.77
provide grazing for animals 0.76
be slow in wildlands 0.75
provide poor grazing for animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(habitat, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marsh, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, is endangered)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, is habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(coral reef, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(coral reef, is endangered)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(marsh, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(marsh, is endangered)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grassland, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, is endangered)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wetland, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(wetland, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tundra, is habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(habitat, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsh, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coral reef, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vehicle, be slow in wildlands)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tundra, is habitat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(habitat, is endangered)