tundra: have biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have biodiversity 1.00
have low biodiversity 0.96
have least biodiversity 0.95
is habitat 0.81
is ecosystem 0.75
be called coral reefs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be called coral reefs)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(coral reef, be called coral reefs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be called coral reefs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have low biodiversity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tundra, have least biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tundra, have low biodiversity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tundra, have low biodiversity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tundra, have low biodiversity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tundra, is habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coral reef, be called coral reefs)