tunnel: were important to rail roads

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.67 , route Weight: 0.64 , structure Weight: 0.63 , facility Weight: 0.61
Siblings	underground Weight: 0.55 , bridge Weight: 0.35 , rail Weight: 0.34 , stadium Weight: 0.34 , construction site Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were important to rail roads	1.00
be considered roads	0.87
be on railway track	0.85
be considered efficient roads	0.83
be on railway track fixed	0.83
be considered more efficient roads	0.82
get more icy than highways	0.82
be on railway track fixed to sleepers	0.82
be on railway track fixed to large sleepers	0.81
be on railway track fixed to wide sleepers	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to sleepers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to large sleepers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to wide sleepers)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(bridge, were important to rail roads)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered roads)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(rail, be on railway track)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(bridge, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(bridge, were important to rail roads)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(rail, be on railway track) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(rail, be on railway track)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(rail, be considered roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(rail, be considered roads)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(rail, be on railway track fixed)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to sleepers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(rail, be on railway track fixed to sleepers)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to wide sleepers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(rail, be on railway track fixed to wide sleepers)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(rail, be on railway track fixed to large sleepers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(rail, be on railway track fixed to large sleepers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(rail, be on railway track)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(rail, be considered roads)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(rail, be on railway track fixed)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(bridge, were important to rail roads)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(rail, be on railway track fixed to sleepers)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(rail, be on railway track fixed to wide sleepers)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rail, be on railway track fixed to large sleepers)