rail: be considered efficient roads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered efficient roads 1.00
be considered more efficient roads 0.99
be considered more efficient paved roads 0.93
be considered efficient paved roads 0.93
be considered roads 0.91
be like roads 0.88
be considered paved roads 0.85
be called highways 0.85
were important to rail roads 0.83
drive more efficient 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(highway, drive more efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(highway, be called highways)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(highway, be called highways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(highway, be called highways)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(highway, drive more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(highway, drive more efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rail, be considered roads)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(highway, be called highways)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(highway, drive more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to rail roads)