rail: be considered paved roads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered paved roads 1.00
be considered efficient paved roads 0.96
be considered more efficient paved roads 0.95
be considered roads 0.89
be considered efficient roads 0.85
be like roads 0.85
be considered more efficient roads 0.83
be called highways 0.82
were important to rail roads 0.80
be called highway 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(highway, be called highways)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(highway, be called highway)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(highway, be called highways)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(highway, be called highways)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(highway, be called highway)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(highway, be called highway)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rail, be considered roads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered roads)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(rail, be considered roads)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered roads)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(highway, be called highways)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(highway, be called highway)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to rail roads)