turkey: be better than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.66
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.51
, pheasant
Weight: 0.38
, goose
Weight: 0.38
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than chicken 0.93
be cheaper than chicken 0.93
be healthier than chicken 0.92
be different from chicken 0.92
be better than beef 0.87
be better than ham 0.87
be different than chickens 0.86
be less expensive than chickens 0.85
be healthier than pig 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be better than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(turkey, be better than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be different from chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be better than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(turkey, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)