turkey: be cheaper than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.66
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.51
, pheasant
Weight: 0.38
, goose
Weight: 0.38
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than chicken 0.95
be better than chicken 0.93
be cheaper than beef 0.91
be healthier than chicken 0.89
be less expensive than chickens 0.88
be different from chicken 0.87
be less expensive than chickens per pound 0.84
be healthier than pig 0.82
be different than chickens 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be more expensive than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(turkey, be better than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(turkey, be better than chicken)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be healthier than chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(turkey, be better than chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be better than chicken)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(turkey, be different from chicken)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be different from chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(turkey, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)