uber: be banned in germany

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in germany 1.00
be illegal in germany 0.92
be banned in spain 0.90
be banned in japan 0.89
be banned in london 0.87
be banned from london 0.87
be banned from california 0.84
be banned in vancouver 0.84
be banned in york 0.84
is banned 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chick, is banned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chick, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chick, is banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(uber, be illegal in germany)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(uber, be illegal in germany)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(uber, be illegal in germany)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(uber, be illegal in germany)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uber, is banned)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, is banned)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(uber, is banned)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(uber, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chick, is banned)