uber: be banned in japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in japan 1.00
be banned in germany 0.89
be banned in spain 0.87
be banned from california 0.86
be banned in london 0.84
be banned in vancouver 0.84
be banned from london 0.84
be banned again in vancouver 0.84
is banned 0.84
be banned in york 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chick, is banned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chick, is banned)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chick, is banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in japan)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in germany)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, is banned)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uber, is banned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(uber, is banned)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(uber, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chick, is banned)