unemployment: be high in spain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in spain high 1.00
be high in spain 1.00
be in spain 0.96
be high in europe 0.87
be high in italy 0.87
be high in france 0.86
be in greece high 0.85
be high in india 0.82
be in europe 0.82
be high in canada 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(economy, be in europe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(economy, be in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(economy, be in europe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in spain)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in france)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in france)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in france)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in italy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in spain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(economy, be in europe)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)