unemployment: be high in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in france 1.00
be high in europe 0.86
be in spain high 0.86
be high in spain 0.86
be high in italy 0.85
be high in india 0.83
be in georgia high 0.82
be in greece high 0.82
be high in africa 0.82
be high in quebec 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in france)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in spain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in spain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in spain)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in europe)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)