unemployment: be in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk 1.00
is uk 0.99
be high in uk 0.95
fall in uk 0.94
fall uk 0.94
be low in uk 0.93
exist in uk 0.93
increase in uk 0.91
rise in uk 0.91
decrease in uk 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spending, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spending, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spending, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spending, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(unemployment, be in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(unemployment, be low in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(unemployment, fall in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(spending, is uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(unemployment, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(spending, is uk)