unemployment: be problem in north america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in north america 1.00
be in america problem 0.95
be problem in south africa 0.92
exist in south america 0.92
be social problem in america 0.90
be in america 0.87
be problem in africa 0.85
be problem in zimbabwe 0.85
exist in america 0.85
be in india problem 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(unemployment, be problem in north america)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in north america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in north america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)