unemployment: have open market disadvantages of

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have open market disadvantages of 1.00
exist in free market economy 0.77
be feasible in modern open economy 0.76
be feasible in open economy 0.76
exist in market economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income, be feasible in modern open economy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in market economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in market economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(unemployment, have open market disadvantages of)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(income, be feasible in modern open economy)