uranium: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tungsten
Weight: 0.37
, iron ore
Weight: 0.37
, molybdenum
Weight: 0.37
, manganese
Weight: 0.37
, ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is 238 resource 0.94
be considered resource 0.89
is valuable resource 0.89
is non resource 0.88
is required resource 0.87
be called potential resource 0.87
is renewable resource 0.83
is non renewable resource 0.82
is 238 nonrenewable resource 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(uranium, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(uranium, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is valuable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(uranium, is valuable resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(uranium, is renewable resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(uranium, is valuable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(uranium, is valuable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(uranium, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(uranium, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)