value: affect human resource planning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect human resource planning 1.00
be used in estate planning 0.77
affect business processes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trust, be used in estate planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(trust, be used in estate planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(trust, be used in estate planning)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(value, affect human resource planning)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(value, affect business processes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(value, affect business processes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(value, affect business processes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(value, affect human resource planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(value, affect human resource planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(value, affect human resource planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trust, be used in estate planning)