value: affect business processes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect business processes 1.00
be important for business 0.80
be important in business world 0.79
be good in business 0.79
be good for business 0.77
be added important to business 0.77
affect human resource planning 0.76
be beneficial for businesses 0.76
enhance workplace productivity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(diversity, be good in business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(integrity, be important in business world)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(value, affect business processes)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(value, affect human resource planning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(value, affect human resource planning)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(value, be added important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(value, affect human resource planning)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(value, affect human resource planning)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be added important to business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(value, be added important to business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be added important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(value, affect business processes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrity, be important for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(value, affect business processes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)