value: be important to professional practice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to professional practice 1.00
differ from professional ethics 0.78
be important in work 0.77
be important in field 0.76
be important in team 0.76
be important in sport 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trait, be important in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to professional practice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(trait, be important in field)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(trait, be important in field)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trust, be important in team)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trait, be important in field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important to professional practice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equity, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(equity, be important in sport)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(integrity, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trust, be important in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(trust, be important in team)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fairness, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(value, be important to professional practice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to professional practice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trait, be important in field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equity, be important in sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in sport)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(trust, be important in team)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(value, be important to professional practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trait, be important in field)