value: matter in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.69
, integrity
Weight: 0.68
, trust
Weight: 0.68
, equity
Weight: 0.67
, diversity
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
matter in workplace 1.00
be essential to balanced workplace 0.80
enhance workplace productivity 0.80
matter 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matter)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trait, matter)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trait, matter)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(brand, matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trait, matter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be essential to balanced workplace)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(trust, matter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(equity, matter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fairness, matter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diversity, matter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(integrity, matter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matter)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trait, matter)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(value, matter in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(integrity, matter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(integrity, matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fairness, matter)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fairness, matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(diversity, matter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(diversity, matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(equity, matter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(equity, matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(trust, matter)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(trust, matter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diversity, be essential to balanced workplace)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(diversity, be essential to balanced workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(value, matter in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(value, matter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(value, matter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(value, matter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(value, matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(value, matter in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(trait, matter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(integrity, matter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fairness, matter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(equity, matter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(trust, matter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(diversity, matter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(diversity, be essential to balanced workplace)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(trait, matter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(value, matter in workplace)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matter)