vertebrate: be more complex than invertebrate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex than invertebrate 1.00
be more complex than invertebrates 0.90
differ from invertebrate 0.87
be better than invertebrates 0.85
be much larger than invertebrates 0.84
be larger than invertebrates 0.84
be smarter than invertebrates 0.83
be more endangered than invertebrates 0.83
be bigger than invertebrates 0.83
grow larger than invertebrates 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, differ from invertebrate)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, differ from invertebrate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, differ from invertebrate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(vertebrate, differ from invertebrate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrate)