vet: need science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet owner
Weight: 0.60
, care
Weight: 0.58
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.55
Siblings veterinarian
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.32
, nurse
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
need science 1.00
use science 0.94
need physics 0.83
use science diet 0.81
push science diet 0.80
need chemistry 0.78
recommend science diet 0.78
know math 0.77
use hill 's science diet 0.77
recommend hill 's science diet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend science diet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need physics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend science diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, recommend science diet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vet, need science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(vet, use science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science diet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vet, push science diet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vet, use science)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vet, need science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need physics)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(veterinarian, recommend science diet)