vet: use science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet owner
Weight: 0.60
, care
Weight: 0.58
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.55
Siblings veterinarian
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.32
, nurse
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
use science 1.00
need science 0.94
use science diet 0.85
push science diet 0.80
need physics 0.79
use hill 's science diet 0.79
recommend science diet 0.78
use chemistry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend science diet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need physics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend science diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, recommend science diet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vet, use science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, need science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science diet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vet, push science diet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vet, need science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vet, use hill 's science diet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vet, recommend science diet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vet, need science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(vet, need science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(vet, use science diet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(vet, push science diet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(vet, use hill 's science diet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(vet, recommend science diet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(vet, push science diet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vet, use science diet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vet, use hill 's science diet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vet, recommend science diet)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vet, push science diet)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(vet, use science diet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(vet, use hill 's science diet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vet, recommend science diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(vet, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need physics)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vet, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(veterinarian, recommend science diet)