veterinarian: be paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid 1.00
is paid 0.99
get paid 0.97
is paid little 0.89
pay 0.87
earn money 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(veterinarian, be paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(veterinarian, be paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(physician, be paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(physician, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, be paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, be paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(physician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(physician, is paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(physician, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(physician, be paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(veterinarian, be paid)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(veterinarian, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(veterinarian, pay)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(veterinarian, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(veterinarian, get paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(veterinarian, pay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, pay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veterinarian, earn money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(veterinarian, earn money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, pay)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, earn money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, earn money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(veterinarian, be paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(physician, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(physician, be paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(veterinarian, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)