veterinarian: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
be paid 0.89
pay 0.80
earn more money than others 0.79
earn money 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(physician, be paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(physician, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(physician, is paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(physician, is paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(physician, be paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(physician, be paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, be paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, earn more money than others)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(veterinarian, pay)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(veterinarian, is paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, earn money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(veterinarian, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(veterinarian, pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(veterinarian, be paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, pay)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(veterinarian, earn money)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(veterinarian, earn more money than others)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, be paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, earn money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(veterinarian, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veterinarian, earn money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, earn more money than others)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(veterinarian, be paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(veterinarian, earn more money than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(physician, is paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(physician, be paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(veterinarian, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)