vinyl: be better than cds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cds 1.00
be better than cd 0.88
be more expensive than cd 0.86
be better than digital 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than cds)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than digital)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cds)