vinyl: be better than digital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than digital 1.00
compare to digital music 0.85
be considered better over digital lossless 0.84
be considered superior to digital recordings 0.82
is better quality 0.78
has quality better 0.78
is better sound quality 0.76
be better than cds 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than digital)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital)