vinyl: be considered superior to digital recordings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered superior to digital recordings 1.00
be considered superior to recordings 0.96
compare to digital music 0.84
be considered better over digital lossless 0.83
be better than digital 0.82
be considered superior 0.77
be considered better over lossless 0.77
is best sound quality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)