vinyl: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
is better quality 0.98
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is better sound quality 0.89
is quality 0.89
is best quality 0.89
is best sound quality 0.84
be considered better 0.79
is sound quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(acetate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(acetate, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(acetate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(vinyl, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)