vote: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
CAN good 0.78
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(majority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(majority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(majority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dissent, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(turnout, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ballot, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(turnout, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(majority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vote, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(dissent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dissent, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ballot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ballot, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(turnout, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(turnout, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(turnout, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(turnout, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(vote, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(majority, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dissent, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ballot, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(turnout, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(turnout, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vote, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(majority, has quality bad)