voter: is i d unconstitutional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is i d unconstitutional 1.00
is d unconstitutional 0.97
is i d law 0.90
be i d laws constitutional 0.89
is i d discriminatory 0.89
be i d laws discriminatory 0.88
is i d laws controversial 0.87
is i d laws good 0.87
is i d laws 0.87
be i d laws 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d unconstitutional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(voter, is i d unconstitutional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(voter, is i d unconstitutional)