vulture: have strong beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, scavenger
Weight: 0.61
, villain
Weight: 0.58
, predator
Weight: 0.56
Siblings condor
Weight: 0.62
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have strong beak 1.00
has physical part beak 0.93
have sharp claws 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vulture, have strong beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beak)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part beak)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(vulture, have strong beak)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vulture, has physical part beak)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(vulture, has physical part beak)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vulture, have strong beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part beak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(vulture, have strong beak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)