waiter: be at diner

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at diner 1.00
be at diner paid 0.96
be called waiter 0.78
be in restaurants called 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(waiter, be at diner)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waiter, be called waiter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(waiter, be called waiter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(waiter, be called waiter)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be called waiter)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be in restaurants called)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner)