walking: is bad luck

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents way
Weight: 0.66
, behavior
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, pursuit
Weight: 0.58
, exercise
Weight: 0.57
Siblings jogging
Weight: 0.35
, bicycling
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, dancing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad luck 1.00
is rain good luck 0.91
is ladder bad luck 0.87
is ladder luck 0.81
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(walking, is bad luck)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dancing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bicycling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jogging, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(walking, is bad luck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(jogging, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jogging, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bicycling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bicycling, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dancing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dancing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(walking, is bad luck)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(walking, is ladder bad luck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(walking, is rain good luck)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(walking, is ladder bad luck)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(walking, is ladder bad luck)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(walking, is ladder luck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(walking, is rain good luck)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walking, is ladder bad luck)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(walking, is rain good luck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(walking, is rain good luck)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(walking, is ladder luck)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(walking, is ladder luck)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(walking, is ladder luck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(walking, is bad luck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dancing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bicycling, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(jogging, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(walking, is bad luck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)