walnut: be cheaper than pecans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than pecans 1.00
be better than pecans 0.97
be healthier than pecans 0.95
be better than almonds 0.84
be called walnuts 0.81
be cheaper than maple 0.80
be cheaper than wood 0.79
be cheaper than hard wood 0.78
have fruit 0.77
be more expensive than softwoods 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, have fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, be cheaper than maple)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mahogany, be cheaper than maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mahogany, be cheaper than maple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit tree, have fruit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mahogany, be cheaper than maple)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit tree, have fruit)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)