waste: be considered as pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as pollution 1.00
be considered as visual pollution 0.91
contribute to pollution 0.90
contribute to pollution of surface water 0.87
is environmental problem 0.79
be harmful to environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, contribute to pollution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(waste, contribute to pollution of surface water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(waste, contribute to pollution of surface water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(waste, contribute to pollution of surface water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(waste, be considered as visual pollution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(waste, contribute to pollution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(waste, be considered as visual pollution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waste, contribute to pollution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(waste, contribute to pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waste, be considered as visual pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waste, contribute to pollution of surface water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waste, is environmental problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(waste, is environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(waste, is environmental problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(waste, be considered as visual pollution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, be harmful to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment)