waste: be harmful to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to environment 1.00
affect environment 0.88
be harmful to humans 0.87
be bad for environment 0.86
be toxic to humans 0.78
is beneficial 0.76
is hazardous 0.76
is toxic 0.76
be considered as pollution 0.75
be environmentally sustainable 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waste, be harmful to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(compost, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(compost, be environmentally sustainable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is hazardous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(trichloroethylene, is toxic)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is beneficial)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(composting, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(landfill, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(composting, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(composting, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(compost, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(compost, affect environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(composting, is beneficial)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(trichloroethylene, is toxic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(trichloroethylene, is toxic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(landfill, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(landfill, is hazardous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(compost, be environmentally sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(compost, be environmentally sustainable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, be harmful to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(waste, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(waste, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(waste, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(waste, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(waste, be considered as pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(waste, be considered as pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(waste, be considered as pollution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(waste, be considered as pollution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waste, is toxic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(waste, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(waste, is toxic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waste, is hazardous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waste, is hazardous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waste, is toxic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(waste, is hazardous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(waste, is hazardous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(waste, is toxic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waste, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(composting, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compost, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(composting, is beneficial)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(trichloroethylene, is toxic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(landfill, is hazardous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(compost, be environmentally sustainable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(waste, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)