waste: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
has quality bad 0.80
be important for economy 0.76
be good for earth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(resource, be important for economy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(composting, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(compost, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(composting, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trash, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(resource, be important for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(composting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(composting, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(compost, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(compost, affect environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(composting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(composting, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trash, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(trash, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(waste, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(waste, affect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(waste, affect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(waste, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waste, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(waste, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(waste, be harmful to environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(waste, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(composting, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compost, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(composting, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(trash, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)