compost: be good for earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, amendment
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, waste
Weight: 0.56
Siblings composting
Weight: 0.35
, manure
Weight: 0.35
, fertilizer
Weight: 0.34
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, human waste
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for earth 1.00
be on earth 0.92
help earth 0.90
is good fertiliser 0.81
be good for soil 0.81
be bad for ocean 0.79
sink to center of earth 0.78
be bad for water 0.78
be good for environment 0.78
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, sink to center of earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(material, sink to center of earth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(material, sink to center of earth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trash bag, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for soil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(manure, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, sink to center of earth)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for earth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(composting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(composting, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for soil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be good for soil)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(compost, be good for earth)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(compost, help earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(compost, help earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(compost, help earth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(material, sink to center of earth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(trash bag, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for soil)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(material, sink to center of earth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compost, be good for earth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)