waste: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	topic Weight: 0.61 , action Weight: 0.59 , resource Weight: 0.58 , substance Weight: 0.57 , issue Weight: 0.57
Siblings	compost Weight: 0.56 , trichloroethylene Weight: 0.42 , composting Weight: 0.34 , trash Weight: 0.33 , landfill Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
be bad for environment	0.80
has quality resource	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(composting, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(trash, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(waste, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(composting, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(composting, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(trash, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(trash, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(waste, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(waste, be bad for environment)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(waste, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(composting, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(trash, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(waste, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)