wavelength: be inversely proportional to frequency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely proportional to frequency 1.00
is inversely related 0.89
have lower frequency 0.88
have higher frequency 0.87
be related to frequency 0.85
is proportional 0.85
affect frequency 0.85
have frequency 0.84
multiplied by frequency equal 0.84
multiplied by frequency light equal 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have frequency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have frequency)