wedding cake: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chocolate cake
Weight: 0.76
, cake
Weight: 0.74
, dessert
Weight: 0.72
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.71
Siblings christmas cake
Weight: 0.41
, fruitcake
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.37
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.37
, apple pie
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste different 0.92
taste better on day 0.88
taste better on second day 0.83
taste foods 0.82
taste eggy 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
taste better then healthier foods 0.80
pops taste raw 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste different)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wedding cake, taste different)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(wedding cake, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)