western australia: is populated

Related concepts

Parents	australia Weight: 0.65 , state Weight: 0.62 , country Weight: 0.60 , region Weight: 0.60 , place Weight: 0.60
Siblings	central african republic Weight: 0.36 , west germany Weight: 0.36 , central american country Weight: 0.36 , east asia Weight: 0.35 , sydney Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is populated	1.00
was populated	0.98
is sparsely populated	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(region, is populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(australia, is populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(australia, is sparsely populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(australia, is populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(east asia, is populated)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(sydney, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(western australia, is populated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(western australia, is populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(western australia, is populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(western australia, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(sydney, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(sydney, is populated)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(east asia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(east asia, is populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(western australia, is populated)

Similarity expansion

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(western australia, was populated)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(western australia, was populated)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(western australia, is sparsely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(australia, is populated)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(australia, is sparsely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(sydney, is populated)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(east asia, is populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(australia, is populated)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(western australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(australia, is sparsely populated)